WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:00.009 --> 00:00:03.620
Remember to like, subscribe and ding that Bell button. lol

00:00:03.620 --> 00:00:07.240
I'm Gloria Borger and you're watching Pew News.

00:00:07.240 --> 00:00:08.560
Pew pew pew

00:00:08.560 --> 00:00:18.280
Pew News intro.

00:00:18.400 --> 00:00:20.300
A lot of YouTube drama this week

00:00:20.300 --> 00:00:22.860
so much controversy and

00:00:22.860 --> 00:00:28.500
finally not anything about that stupid potty mouth foul

00:00:28.500 --> 00:00:30.380
YouTuber Swede PewDiePie,

00:00:30.380 --> 00:00:32.360
Please stop mixing me up with him.

00:00:32.360 --> 00:00:34.340
Ok, I'm Gloryaia Brogerr

00:00:34.900 --> 00:00:36.640
Reputable news journalist.

00:00:36.640 --> 00:00:40.160
Our first news comes from Australia

00:00:40.160 --> 00:00:41.300
From Pogo

00:00:41.300 --> 00:00:42.400
you guys know Pogo?

00:00:42.400 --> 00:00:44.460
he makes these sort of music remixes on

00:00:44.600 --> 00:00:45.320
On YouTube

00:00:45.320 --> 00:00:47.680
as Disney mashups type of stuff

00:00:47.680 --> 00:00:50.340
maybe you watch it but let's give it a little taste

00:00:50.340 --> 00:01:01.080
(Said video plays)

00:01:01.120 --> 00:01:03.600
Full disclosure guys. Of course

00:01:03.600 --> 00:01:04.900
here on Pew News.

00:01:04.900 --> 00:01:07.240
Of Course, I'm gonna be a hundred percent honest

00:01:07.240 --> 00:01:09.020
I'm a big fan of Pogo's music.

00:01:09.020 --> 00:01:12.160
I think like ... pogo's music.

00:01:12.160 --> 00:01:12.920
(laughs)

00:01:12.920 --> 00:01:16.220
I've listened to that his album weightless countless times,

00:01:16.220 --> 00:01:17.120
It's so good

00:01:17.120 --> 00:01:26.260
(The said album plays)

00:01:26.320 --> 00:01:31.520
I love it so much two things that I know about pogo that I never really process number one

00:01:31.520 --> 00:01:38.659
His username is I've noticed that if you go on pogo's YouTube channel page the URL that links to it is F A G

00:01:38.940 --> 00:01:44.899
O T  T A R O N I've seen that before and I thought way that's a bit strange

00:01:44.900 --> 00:01:50.029
Is it because he made his channel in 2007? He was a lot younger back then and had a

00:01:50.580 --> 00:01:58.190
Silly childish sense of humor and never really bothered to change it or is it because he actually hates gay people

00:01:58.770 --> 00:02:01.699
Well Pogo decided to answer that question. I

00:02:02.550 --> 00:02:04.550
came up with  F***Tron because

00:02:05.010 --> 00:02:07.490
I've always had a very thorough

00:02:08.940 --> 00:02:10.560
dislike of

00:02:10.560 --> 00:02:15.619
Homosexuals to put this in context he makes these live streams where he does random stuff

00:02:16.620 --> 00:02:20.929
Like he explained he randomly meditating or not doing anything

00:02:21.690 --> 00:02:23.360
to dumbfound people

00:02:23.360 --> 00:02:30.589
I'm guessing he thought it was so obvious that he's not a homophobe that he could make this sort of joke satiring homophobes

00:02:30.989 --> 00:02:37.249
cause that's really what it is. He's trying he said he's trying to do satire and it's too

00:02:37.769 --> 00:02:40.279
Real if you don't know Pogo if you don't know

00:02:40.860 --> 00:02:44.330
His type of humor and you see this sort of clip coming out of nowhere

00:02:44.940 --> 00:02:47.149
obviously a lot of people think it's real and

00:02:47.910 --> 00:02:55.100
Therefore it gets reported as such by the verge for example saying Disney remix of Pogo can't walk back on his homophobic comments

00:02:55.100 --> 00:03:01.459
There's so many articles reporting this now and I think a lot of people know as well that it is satire

00:03:01.459 --> 00:03:03.000
He was trying to make a joke

00:03:03.000 --> 00:03:06.529
But it really doesn't matter at this point because if you get to that level

00:03:06.750 --> 00:03:13.760
It's just going to keep going. I understand if people are upset about these kind of thing, but I think this comment I found

00:03:14.640 --> 00:03:16.380
encapsulates the situation

00:03:16.380 --> 00:03:22.309
Perfectly great joke Pogo. I found it really funny how you said you hated a whole group of people for something

00:03:22.310 --> 00:03:29.299
They can't control have fun with your ruined career. It's basically saying I know you're joking. I don't care if you're joking

00:03:29.610 --> 00:03:35.209
Enjoy having your career ruined and it's so pity to me to just ignore the fact that if someone is joking or not

00:03:35.560 --> 00:03:42.420
Even if it was a bad joke or even if it didn't really line with a lot of people just ignoring that completely

00:03:42.840 --> 00:03:44.840
It seems dishonest and vicious

00:03:45.640 --> 00:03:48.029
Which I guess is kind of a hypocritical in

00:03:48.250 --> 00:03:52.890
A way to say I don't know the thing is pogo made an apology and it's so bad it is

00:03:54.500 --> 00:03:56.739
ughh Pogo!

00:03:56.739 --> 00:04:02.609
PoNo! Damn it! Oh dear. Oh dear the controversy. I have sparked whatever I

00:04:02.610 --> 00:04:06.869
what have I done my goodness? Okay, I get it. He's not really apologizing

00:04:06.870 --> 00:04:10.289
He's not backing down on his belief and in a lot of ways. I can respect that

00:04:10.720 --> 00:04:13.679
But he also used to have in a description of this video

00:04:13.930 --> 00:04:18.600
explaining that he's I don't know if you even had Asperger or some form of autism and

00:04:18.790 --> 00:04:25.109
that he struggled with empathy for people and I think he wanted to make this joke without realizing that yes, it could actually

00:04:25.930 --> 00:04:32.430
Have a negative impact on a lot of people at least then I understand sort of how this situation occurred

00:04:32.430 --> 00:04:35.850
I understand how he thinks and what he's trying to accomplish

00:04:36.520 --> 00:04:37.530
instead in this video

00:04:37.530 --> 00:04:44.010
He goes on a very anti PC rant and I'm all for that but in the right time guys in the right time

00:04:44.320 --> 00:04:47.669
Don't go spouting about Peterson and all these right-wing

00:04:48.190 --> 00:04:52.919
Politicians I'm getting so tired of social politics like two weeks ago. I'm like, yeah

00:04:53.110 --> 00:04:58.380
Everyone's a hypocrite and I feel I feel him I get it. There's so much hypocrisy in social politics

00:04:58.380 --> 00:05:03.749
He's making fun of homophobes. But instead he gets labeled as one who's right and wrong. I don't know

00:05:03.750 --> 00:05:08.250
I'm so lost and just like oh god, I don't know. I think it's a shame. He's clearly

00:05:08.250 --> 00:05:12.450
Oh, he even said himself that he's you know struggled with his own sexuality

00:05:12.540 --> 00:05:17.460
Not really saying too much, but you know, what do you guys think is he right or is it wrong?

00:05:17.800 --> 00:05:18.500
(meme review)

00:05:18.660 --> 00:05:26.100
Another homophobe on YouTube god dammit. There's so many of them who's next? Mr. Beast? I knew it. I knew it

00:05:18.669 --> 00:05:26.099
Another homophobe on YouTube god dammit. There's so many of them who's next. Mr. Beast. I knew it. I knew it

00:05:26.100 --> 00:05:30.629
I knew it What did he say? What foul thing? Did he say now?

00:05:30.629 --> 00:05:34.780
Okay can possibly be worse than Pogo. "Windows is gay"

00:05:35.400 --> 00:05:37.400
(silence)

00:05:37.820 --> 00:05:41.980
This is absolutely outrageous, thank you the Atlantic

00:05:43.639 --> 00:05:46.809
For digging deep in mr. Beast's Twitter

00:05:47.419 --> 00:05:52.749
Exposing him for he true who he truly is how dare he speak of Windows in such a negative light

00:05:53.360 --> 00:05:58.389
Thank You the Atlantic for doing the work the good work of the people

00:05:58.389 --> 00:06:02.318
I always had my doubts but finally someone could uncover this truth

00:06:02.319 --> 00:06:08.919
Now this article is a lot easier to just break down as trying to paint. Mr. Beast in the worst light

00:06:09.680 --> 00:06:16.980
The headline says YouTube's biggest philanthropist has history of homophobic comments. I wouldn't really call Mr. Beast the

00:06:17.500 --> 00:06:19.500
Philanthropist no offense, mr. Beast

00:06:19.509 --> 00:06:21.020
uh

00:06:21.020 --> 00:06:27.039
It's like they're setting him up to knock him down the Jesus of me of YouTube the Jesus Christ of YouTube

00:06:27.039 --> 00:06:33.699
Is actually Satan guys. Listen to this. He said Windows is gay guys. He can't do that

00:06:33.699 --> 00:06:37.299
He can't just do that. What else did he say? I don't have a printer f**

00:06:39.349 --> 00:06:42.429
The homophobia runs deep in the YouTube community

00:06:43.300 --> 00:06:44.330
*rolling eyes*

00:06:44.330 --> 00:06:47.800
Okay, it's very similar to the Vice article

00:06:47.870 --> 00:06:51.909
You're just looking to paint someone in a negative light for the sake of clicks

00:06:51.909 --> 00:06:59.019
And for the sake of making youtubers look bad because obviously the media is gonna benefit from that you have this new platform

00:06:59.780 --> 00:07:00.340
uh

00:07:00.349 --> 00:07:05.769
Taking over for almost everything, you know, they're losing numbers. We're gaining numbers

00:07:05.770 --> 00:07:10.569
So if they can make youtubers look bad and if they can generate clicks at the same time, obviously

00:07:10.969 --> 00:07:17.379
It's a win-win situation for them. Even if I hate using the word, but Millennials call them out on it. It doesn't really matter

00:07:17.379 --> 00:07:24.338
Why didn't you tell me you were homophobic when you donated 6000 to me and my lesbian partner two months ago. That's right. Mr

00:07:24.339 --> 00:07:28.989
Beast huh? The thing here that I find so ridiculous is the fact that

00:07:30.259 --> 00:07:35.288
Taylor the person who wrote this article clearly dug deep into mr

00:07:35.289 --> 00:07:40.778
Beast's Twitter these sort of comments were made years ago, but if you go into Taylor said Twitter

00:07:41.700 --> 00:07:47.569
She created it in 2010 despite very curiously she only has five hundred tweets

00:07:48.240 --> 00:07:54.529
570 tweets and the first tweet she ever made was in February the February 1st this year

00:07:55.830 --> 00:08:00.830
Hmm.. So what are you hiding Taylor Laurens? Why are you deleting your tweets?

00:08:00.830 --> 00:08:02.100
(e x p o s e d)

00:08:02.100 --> 00:08:08.180
anyone can play this game where you dig deep in someone's Twitter and find something that you can take out of context or or take

00:08:08.180 --> 00:08:15.379
At face value and say hey, we got you. You said this you used this word. It's just so ridiculous. It's the same thing when

00:08:15.379 --> 00:08:16.650
uh

00:08:16.650 --> 00:08:19.400
Wall Street Journal article came out about me and one of the

00:08:19.620 --> 00:08:23.600
Journalists, that wrote the article made very similar jokes to what I had made

00:08:23.760 --> 00:08:24.260
uh

00:08:24.150 --> 00:08:30.280
on his own Twitter if you have more than a couple thousand subscribers, make sure you delete all your old tweets because

00:08:24.260 --> 00:08:30.280
on his own Twitter if you have more than a couple thousand subscribers, make sure you delete all your tweets because

00:08:30.280 --> 00:08:30.930
uh

00:08:30.920 --> 00:08:33.400
Apparently it will blow back at you in the future

00:08:33.400 --> 00:08:35.200
PEW PEW PEW PEW PEW PEW PEW PEW

00:08:33.410 --> 00:08:35.200
PEWPEWPEWPEWPEWPEW

00:08:35.200 --> 00:08:36.419
(clap clap clap)

00:08:35.260 --> 00:08:36.520
👏👏👏

00:08:36.520 --> 00:08:42.940
Zoella and Alfie are getting called out by the BBC it just keeps going it just keeps going

00:08:43.650 --> 00:08:45.420
so dumb

00:08:45.420 --> 00:08:52.070
BBC spends times writing this YouTube stars might encourage kids to eat more calories. Oh, no

00:08:52.650 --> 00:08:59.359
Because Zoella posted oh how I will miss all the amazing bakeries and ice cream shops when we get home

00:08:59.420 --> 00:09:03.890
how dare Zoella pose with an ice cream, how dare she

00:09:04.920 --> 00:09:08.360
Disgusting despicable she deserves to get called out

00:09:08.360 --> 00:09:13.040
I'm so not supposed to say my own opinion Gloria Borger here, but man

00:09:13.740 --> 00:09:18.740
How could she I'm trying to understand where they I don't know why I put on my headphones

00:09:19.140 --> 00:09:23.059
Then I'm just gonna keep them on shut up walk me through this cuz I don't get it

00:09:23.150 --> 00:09:26.239
okay, so they did a study in the your

00:09:26.239 --> 00:09:26.940
um

00:09:26.940 --> 00:09:30.020
percentage of the european congress of obesity where they took

00:09:30.540 --> 00:09:33.379
Social media stars like Zoella and Alfie Deyes

00:09:33.690 --> 00:09:38.660
And they took their followers on instagram and then they took hundred and seventy-six children

00:09:38.660 --> 00:09:44.419
They split him into three groups and shown pictures of Zoella eating healthy snacks

00:09:44.760 --> 00:09:47.160
Zoella eating unhealthy snacks or

00:09:47.720 --> 00:09:54.880
Non-food products then they took the childrens and offering a range of healthy and unhealthy snacks between grapes and

00:09:55.200 --> 00:09:56.660
carrots sticks

00:09:56.660 --> 00:10:04.179
Chocolate buttons and jelly sweets and they found that the children who had seen Zoella eating unhealthy snacks

00:10:04.910 --> 00:10:06.619
consumed

00:10:06.620 --> 00:10:10.300
448 calories while the healthy snacks consumed

00:10:10.620 --> 00:10:12.860
357 calories.

00:10:13.660 --> 00:10:15.620
Are you actually fucking retarded?

00:10:16.460 --> 00:10:20.980
Jesus Christ, what the fuck is this study!? It's so dumb!

00:10:21.920 --> 00:10:25.100
*SILENCED SCREAMING*

00:10:25.460 --> 00:10:28.460
This can't be real!? So you showed pictures

00:10:29.620 --> 00:10:31.980
Okay, let's just remove Zoella out of the picture

00:10:32.290 --> 00:10:35.187
So you showed pictures of a person eating healthy foods

00:10:35.187 --> 00:10:38.400
and then you showed picture of someone eating unhealthy foods

00:10:38.400 --> 00:10:41.240
So that was you where you got out of it was the fact that

00:10:41.560 --> 00:10:43.900
people that ate unhealthy foods

00:10:44.340 --> 00:10:45.800
consumed more calories.

00:10:48.380 --> 00:10:50.069
🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

00:10:50.140 --> 00:10:50.980
Wait

00:10:52.069 --> 00:10:53.490
🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

00:10:52.940 --> 00:10:54.020
I'm trying to understand

00:10:54.020 --> 00:10:57.920
all you're doing here is proving that youtubers has influence

00:10:55.800 --> 00:11:00.799
All you're doing here is proving that youtubers has influenced if someone poses with healthy foods, yes

00:10:57.920 --> 00:11:00.248
If someone poses with healthy foods,

00:11:00.248 --> 00:11:02.600
yes you're gonna be drawn to that product

00:11:02.600 --> 00:11:03.500
if someone poses with

00:11:04.020 --> 00:11:07.240
Unhealthy foods. Yes, people are gonna be drawn to that products

00:11:07.240 --> 00:11:10.220
because people look up to youtubers. They're influencers.

00:11:10.220 --> 00:11:11.030
That's how it works.

00:11:11.040 --> 00:11:15.860
If she Zoella wants to pose a picture with an ice cream she has every right to do so

00:11:16.290 --> 00:11:18.090
This is so pathetic

00:11:18.090 --> 00:11:22.130
and also they're painting YouTube in a bad light when really

00:11:22.440 --> 00:11:27.559
they're using Instagram and Twitter as an example and the BBC, you know

00:11:27.560 --> 00:11:31.219
which in UK is paid through TV licence

00:11:31.240 --> 00:11:36.220
So if you have a TV you have to pay TV licence that money goes into funding BBC

00:11:36.380 --> 00:11:44.000
So of course BBC has to benefit from making YouTube look bad because more and more people are consuming

00:11:41.920 --> 00:11:44.000
because more and more people are consuming

00:11:44.040 --> 00:11:44.540
uh

00:11:44.540 --> 00:11:46.540
entertainment through YouTube

00:11:46.620 --> 00:11:48.700
Instead of paying their TV licence.

00:11:48.700 --> 00:11:52.180
Me for example, I don't pay my TV licence because I don't use television.

00:11:52.180 --> 00:11:53.800
So BBC is losing money

00:11:54.600 --> 00:11:59.209
from me because of that and I think I can only imagine that numbers gonna grow more and

00:11:59.360 --> 00:12:02.029
More as more and more people stop consuming

00:11:59.370 --> 00:12:02.029
more as more and more people stop consuming

00:12:02.640 --> 00:12:03.140
uh

00:12:03.140 --> 00:12:08.840
Entertainment through the BBC and TV or whatever like it's not even worth talking about at this point

00:12:06.060 --> 00:12:08.840
Like it's not even worth talking about at this point

00:12:09.160 --> 00:12:09.660
uh

00:12:09.660 --> 00:12:13.180
I'm seriously considering if I should just stop doing pew news

00:12:13.180 --> 00:12:16.880
cuz it's so dumb everything I talk about it's just dumb

00:12:16.880 --> 00:12:20.780
I don't care. I genuinely don't care.

00:12:20.780 --> 00:12:22.729
This videos is just going to get demonetized

00:12:22.729 --> 00:12:24.180
like I'm just getting

00:12:24.180 --> 00:12:27.040
could just be playing some random fucking Minecraft game and

00:12:27.480 --> 00:12:31.940
Make more revenue instead of talking about these things. Why why?

00:12:33.180 --> 00:12:36.320
I'm tired. I'm tired of all of it. I'm done

00:12:37.280 --> 00:12:38.460
I'm done.

00:12:38.600 --> 00:12:39.500
This is it.

00:12:39.500 --> 00:12:45.120
This is the last pew news. Goodbye. I'm Gloria Borger. I'm officially retiring. Goodbye

00:12:45.560 --> 00:12:46.060
I'm-

00:12:46.060 --> 00:12:49.980
*Static*

00:12:50.040 --> 00:12:50.540
RIP PEW News

00:12:53.140 --> 00:12:54.740
This is it.This is the end of Pew News.Get over it.

00:12:53.660 --> 00:12:56.020
Yo why are you lurking over at the end are you some kind of creep? Go away.

00:12:56.620 --> 00:12:58.120
Gotta get to the 13:00 mark tho.

00:12:57.500 --> 00:12:59.500
Gotta get to the 13:00 mark tho.

