h̵̛̙̰̺̺́̑̉̆́́́͋͘͠ṇ̵̝̠̩̞̣̥̣͒͘ň̷̦̓̔ͅa̴̛̘̦̥͖̾͐̆̉̍̽̂͌͝͠u̵̧̧͔̟̝̟̲̫͓͓̬͆̿̎͐̂̃̽̓͊͝͠h̶̛͕̱̰̳͇̓̍͘̚n̷͔̦̺̬͓̥̗̏̋̾̆̉͋̋ͅg̸̨̜̖̀̈́̈̽̑h̴̨͉͔̠̱͉̫̝̞̲̖͊̀̏̇͒̑̓̃̚͝ä̵̼̘̱́̓̄͝u̷̳̭̥̮͆̽̍̋͗͝n̶̳͚͚̖̟͓̠̦̭͚̈́̋̉͋̓̋̋͋́̑ͅm̸͇͉͋͗̂̑́̓͠n̵̡̬͈̼̻̫͕͌̈́͒̂ȟ̵̺͍͕͓̰͓̣͕̮̦͐m̷̡̛̝̻̬͉̭͈̩̒̓p̸̎̓̈́̍̔̉̕ͅb̸̖̥̠̖̽̈͑̒͋̆́ḧ̴̫̦̫̰͔̟̭̥̯́̐̐̽͠ͅ
Good evening. I'm Gloria Borger.
Welcome to Pew News!
*pew news intro* *DJ_Wolff makes pretty mediocre content you should go subscribe*
♪Intro plays ♪
The most politically correct news source of all time.
*sighs* Le sigh.
I wasn't planning to make another Pew News so soon.
Don't worry guys.
Squeaky Memer PewDiePie will be back very soon
There's just so many news!
🚨alarm starts🚨 Breaking news! Breaking news! Breaking news! Breaking news!
Wall Street Journal did an OOPSIE!
WALL STREET JOURNAL ♪🦀-------------------------🦀♪ DID AN OOPSIE!
WSJ apologized to Pewdiepie
This just in.
Oh. My. God.
This was featured on Wall Street Journal's website
Wall Street Journal public apology to PewDiePie.
Finally! YATTA DESU-NE~
You know I'm not supposed to give my own opinion
here on Pew News,
but this is very a... na... a.... [mumbling]
nice
Wall Street Journal, which of course over a year ago
featured PewDiePie through clever editing and out of context cuts making PewDiePie as a Nazi
Now Wall Street Journal have finally decided to apologize
Now that's really nice.
I guess Christmas just brings out the best in people!
They issued this statement: Wall Street Journal would like to apologize to PewDiePie
due to misrepresentation by-
This is real by the way, this is on their website
*laughs*
Due to misrepresentation by our journalists, those of whom have now been fired.
Hmm, that's nice they finally realize you know, that their own reporters
are complete hypocrites, and they've said things that seem irrefutably
Anti-semitic, such as
"My hard-on is purely for the Nazis"
*laughs*
SMH.
I'm not supposed to add my opinion, but that's a Nazi right there
*laughs*
This reminds me of the recent Vox article about PewDiePie, the one that called him a white supremacist.
Turns out the journalist who wrote that article
Likes to use the N-word. A lot. Wow.
You're using it a little liberally now.
You know at least PewDiePie said it once.
She even wrote this article with where she put the picture of me, a fan art, trying to shame me for featuring
someone else's fan art that says I'm gonna say the N-word.
But meanwhile she posts on Twitter
"The n-word ran out of the valley, And so he shot."
What did she mean by this? Top comment will win one of these hats.
Hmm
HMM [but sideways this time]
Having to hear the wenches wail
and the dying N-word moan
I get it, it's probably some lyric, I don't know. I just find it hilarious regardless.
This is not me actually trying to attack this uh...
idiot
I just find it hilarious at every single time someone calls me out, it's always like this.
Vox also edited their article. They changed the title of it which is nice to see and they change the
picture from-
[ANGERY PEWDS SCREM]
They must be trolling at this point.
Why are they choosing that picture.
The goddamn curse picture of me that's everywhere online,
there are other pictures.
Go back to the one where my eyes are closed, right now Vox, or you will face serious
Angery.
So they changed it from white supremacy to "amplified anti-semitic rhetoric"
Okay alright. You're still on the shit list Vox.
Now, back to the Wall Street Journal thing.
So, what happened? Well basically Wall Street Journal site hacked with a pro-PewDiePie message
So uhh...
The hacking never stops, does it? First we have all the printer hacking,
then the printer hack hacked happened again just three days ago.
PewDiePie printers hackers strike again.
"What to do? Unsub from T-Series. Subscribe to PewDiePie! #PrinterHack2"
"My Dymo printer just told me I need to subscribe to PewDiePie, but I'm already subscribed!"
SUBSCRIBE AGAIN!
So basically, this article somehow appeared on The Wall Street Journal's website
I have no idea how they achieved this, but big props to whoever pulled this off
I mean that's hilarious
They were very quick to delete this by the way, there's only an archived version of it
Wall Street Journal also issued a response saying that
the page affected, was not affiliated with the Journal's newsroom.
Oh really! Wow.
Wha- damn it, I thought they actually apologized.
Gloria Borger reached out as well of course for a response, but no reply.
I'm still waiting Wall Street Journal. I'm still waiting.
Ok so this is just- I know I'm not supposed to get my opinion, but I think uhh
this is Oracle, which is their paid program. I don't know what it is, but it's a branch off of
Wall Street Journal's website, where they run articles that seems like they are articles, but they're really just
sponsored posts.
Now, why does Wall Street Journal run
articles that are actually sponsored videos that seem like they are actual articles?
I don't know. Guess they gotta make money.
But all I can say is, I am so [clap] proud [clap] of this community.
Smash, subscribe, PewDiePie now at 77 million subcribers.
There's really never a dull moment this month, I mean they're so goddamn many things happening.
Even yesterday as well, this came out on Twitter with 11,000 retweets
"Our history teacher told us that by supporting PewDiePie,
we're supporting anti-semitism, racism and ignorance."
Let's watch.
[in the video] "...or every time you promote this idea,
you are promoting ignorance, racism, genocide,
anti-semitism." Pewds: Jesus.
[video cont.] "These are all things that you are putting forward when you are doing anything that promotes PewDiePie."
That's right everybody, you ever promote PewDiePie,
you are promoting genocide everyone.
[video cont.] "So be careful about this,
if someone decided to- if something were to happen if PewDiePie were to be sued for this,
you could be complicit. If you retweet it, they can make you pay a fine as well, because you have officially published
anti-semitic things.
So if you are republishing this stuff, you could get in trouble for it.
Be very aware that that is a real thing."
Be very aware that this is complete dogshit, okay.
Blows my mind that a teacher
speaking as a voice of authority over kids in this very strict tone
Things are just plainly not true.
But this really shows you the effect of these articles, people...
People really taking it seriously.
I mean where did he get these crazy ideas, honestly
this is all the context I have for it, so it's kind of hard to judge what-
why this discussion was prompted
and why are...
why this teacher felt like this is necessary.
But it it's kind of disturbing to look at this.
Like this video right now to promote PewDiePie.
Retweeting PewDiePie makes you a Nazi.
What's next, breathing air makes you a Nazi?
I guess that kind of makes it seem like I am a Nazi
I'M NOOOOOT.
Subscribe [clap] to PewDiePie [clap] everybody.
Also saw this today I thought it was hilarious.
[Man speaking Indonesian]
"Subscribe"
"to"
SUBCRIBE TO PEWDIEPIE"
Never stop my fellow Memesters.
Next [clap] news [clap] we have a lot of stuff to go through, that's why I'm doing this okay
stop complaining
We got a lot of, I think, important stuff to discuss
honestly, there's the stuff that I feel needs to be brought to light.
The second news, big thing that I wanted to talk about today is
Copyright issues on YouTube.
This was brought to my attention through my subreddit, it's an artist called TheFatRat
who said that "Are you effing kidding me YouTube??? This is my song!"
And you can show here that his own song was claimed by another company, as if he's
infringing on their copyright.
So basically they get all the revenue from this song. And it looks as well that he has
appealed this claim, and that it has been rejected, even.
So, this was the most top-voted thing on my subreddit, with fifty nine thousand upvotes.
"For anyone who asked how broken YouTube copyright system is? Here's that."
And coming from a YouTuber's perspective, this is 100% accurate, this is not hyperbole.
This is something that happens almost on the daily.
Gus Johnson, another YouTuber, made a great video recently sharing his frustration about this issue.
Sit down, this is important, no editing, one-taking it, this is a big
important ******* issue that we need to talk about.
What do I wake up to today?!
Oh, this claim was manually claimed, not even the automatic detection.
Some mother******, **** you, went in and manually claimed this video as containing
stuff from EMI Music Publishing.
Manually ******* claimed. Now this is not an issue that I am new to at all,
because as you may know, in the past I have had big videos like "Wipe it Like it's Hot"
Guess who ******* claimed that? Music Industries, mother******.
Alright, he's swearing too much, please.
This has happened to me as well, where I literally just sang the song Despacito,
I lost all revenue of a video for doing that.
And this guy literally just played a song on a paper towel dispenser, no lyrics, just drumming
and rapping on a goddamn paper towel dispenser.
And you think that's ridiculous
Well now, as it turns out, even your own material can get copyrighted, so...
That really shows you how easy it is to abuse YouTube's current system.
These ******* music groups are going and claiming that their work is used in videos
When most of the time, no music at all appears in the videos, and some of the time
Commentary channels are talking about other videos
that are using maybe a half a second, a couple seconds of copyrighted music
And these companies, these ***holes, are claiming the entire video.
So basically, you work on a video, you're the sole reason this video gets any traction you're the sole reason this video
is getting any views or anything like all, it's all dependent on you. But if you feature
even a split second of any audio, or copyrighted, or a cover
then they will just take all the revenue of the video.
So basically what happens is you get a
Content ID claim, which basically means that the video will stay up, which is nice
But they will claim all the revenue from the video from that point and on. What you can do is you can appeal this dispute
and say no this is fair use or no
this I think this
Was made in error and they will review it again
But but there was one thing that Gus said that was wrong in this video
which is this they have 30 days they being the
companies that claim the shit to either drop the suit or let YouTube come in and say who's right here
YouTube does not come in and say I who's right here it's basically
Entirely up to the company to decide whether this is fair user or not
which leads to it being abused most of the time I mean it's not really a
Conversation one party decides who gets the money so what happens is this I often
Just gets completely abused, I've had even content that doesn't even feature the song that they claim
Was being used in the video it doesn't even appear in it the whole situation is ridiculous I've had video where I feature mr
B's video in my video which was important for reference
His video however had a background music track in it
That I didn't own so the owner of that background music claimed my video so I lost the revenue out of the entire video
Because mr. Bies used the background music in the video yeah damn you mr. Bean
I'm just kidding but this is an example of how ridiculous it is and that's
Fair use because the way fair use
Works is that you're allowed to reference certain things and explain where it's coming from that's not infringing on copyright
But since it's up to the company to decide whether this is fair user or not and it's in their best
Interest to claim the revenue because don't get the money
no questions asked so of course they're gonna abuse it two days ago my video got claimed because I hummed the theme song of
Halo and
I didn't even use to halo I can't even use the example cuz they're just gonna claim the video again but I basically said
Sponsored I replaced the humming with sponsored as a quick little joke in the start of the video
Mm-mm-mm,
Video
got claimed
That's right
Can't do that. Don't get me wrong here, I don't mind losing the revenue of the video. I mean- yes
I do
But I'll survive it's not that big of a deal the problem I have with this are two things
Number one is that the revenue goes directly into these companies that don't care about
Copyright they just want to make a quick buck if I lost a revenue fine it
it's the fact that it's going to these companies whose is greedy and abusing the system
that really bothers me number two is that you're ruining the
Ecosystem of the internet sure you might make some money now it might be a quick little upfront of money
But what's gonna happen is that people are just gonna stop using any form of music in any video on YouTube I mean I stopped
doing it sometimes it just happens by mistake but generally it just isn't worth it and
The end result of this is that less music gets shared and less people are drawn to that artist
lasagna got big because a lot of people like the song they like to share it they like to talk about it they like to
Have it in their videos they like to make covers of it if I claim those covers as mine
that would just be ridiculous I want people to make covers of it cuz it's good for me it helps me
why music companies and records don't see that it's just be me some however do and I want to give props to
Monstercat at least you know they have this crab rave song which I feature a lot in my videos not just because this is an
awesome song and a funny meme
But because they don't act they whitelisted me at least so that they won't claim the revenue of the video
YouTube themselves talk about this about their argument against article 13 talking about the Drake song them whole mean that
I can't even sing it. I can't even sing it
The Drake song that goes keke do you love me what
This is so hard and people would dance outside the car
That's a meme that I didn't review because I knew my video would just get copyrighted
Even though it is a review it would be a review that's fair use but it doesn't matter
Can't wait for article 13 to make Youtube to be even more annoying
YouTube has a tool now that's in Beta where it lets you edit out parts of the video for example the video where I
Sang halo I could just edit it out and then make the claim so if you are youtuber has this issue
try out the YouTube beta so YouTube has tools to combat this and
I'm glad that that's in place now at least it certainly
made my life ten times easier
but I also think YouTube needs to have a serious talk with their these companies
about what's right and wrong for them to do when you know if we as a
youtuber if we get copyright claim three times we lose our channel
But these companies can just keep claiming and claiming and never be wrong and face no repre caution. I mean there's no fairness in this
It's kind of messed up next news another important issue god
Damn it there's so many things YouTube removes fifty eight million videos featuring hateful and inappropriate content
fifty eight million
Videos god, damn did they delete Leafy's channel yet hahaha
no one likes Leafy hahaha now we definitely seen some interesting development men this year especially I think with Mark Zuckerberg facing Congress
and
Talking about Facebook and also one of the most important things out of that meeting I in my opinion
Was the fact that Zuckerberg said Facebook is responsible for the content that means the social media platforms are
claiming
Responsibility in a sense for the content that's on their platform so now in a sense I think YouTube feels like they have that responsibility
especially with all the media pressure and
what we've seen with the ad pocalypse so far now as
Pointed out an article here by it still gay herion said that the size the mere size of YouTube makes it virtually impossible
To capture every hateful video or abusive content so YouTube has to rely on algorithms to delete these videos
otherwise it would just be impossible and
Well that's not always good for example now you tube channel called monkey Jones
He's a channel that made a lot of videos about
Elliot Rodger if you don't know who this is he's a guy that shot and killed six people
But he generally made it in the sense of making fun of him I saw one over the video where he
Uploaded a video where Elliot Rodger signed up for better help now a monkey Jones channel is
Completely gone there and I think it was from YouTube removing these videos
another channel that God removed was Nick the smoker who does say smoking reviews
Which was then reinstated after Leon Lush
Addressed it on Twitter and that's usually the case here
You there's probably more channels that God affected but not everyone has a voice
Another example was MowtenDoo who has now for the second time had his channel or her channel demonetised
Through, some random claim, or a flag, that showed up and YouTube basically responding
oopsie
We are checking this for you
I can always the understand it's always the first mistake but this is ridiculous having a second time and
Only a few months later with the only difference being a single upload
which conforms to your guidelines as well as being in the same line of
all my existing content now going back to monkey Jones I mean from what I can tell he's uploaded these videos for a while and
Then all the sudden the algorithm hits you and like he said he's lost everything
This is his livelihood in the sense and seeing someone lose their
Revenue out of nowhere there's something messed up with that if you upload a video
The problem is that no one knows the rules if you upload a video
And it no it has no problem in hundreds and thousands of views then you
Imagine that it's safe to say that you can upload a video with a similar style of comedy
Or whatever it is but instead you know he keeps doing it and then when YouTube realized
Oh sh*t, we have to delete this guy's channel now
Which is just messed up they could have just deleted the videos or age-restricted them or?
But why'd they removed the channel now monkey got a lot of support on patreon through this which is great
I mean fans aren't just gonna disappear
but now there's even problem with patreon for example Sam Harris a
Podcaster tweeted out a few days ago that as many of you know the crowdfunding site patreon has banned several prominent
Content creators from its platform while the company insists that each was in violation of its Terms of Service these recent explosions seem more readily
Explained by a political bias although
I don't share the politics of the band members I considered no longer tenable to expose any part of my podcast
fundings to the whims of patrons trust and Safety Committee I find this very
Disappointing because patreon was supposed to be this alternative way for
creators to earn revenue without getting censored sure
Advertisement might not like what you're doing that's understandable in a sense but now
even fan funded crowd funded missions could get censored some pretty crazy times happening right now
so basically one of the bands was the Sargon of Akkad he's defended me from the wall street journal' scrutiny and
Basically his patreon, was banned because from what I can tell he called Nazis the n-word and this was something that
He did outside of his channel and the patreon CEO and Founder has expressed that you shouldn't have to worry about
Losing your revenue on patreon one thing I feel like I just have to say I want to like
Send this back like that's why you're here right
Most create like creators watch this you just don't have to worry about this
You just don't have to worry about it like people like you and people most
people, who are like engaging in healthy dialogue and talking about tough issues like this is just not something that concerns most creators
And it like kills me a little bit that there's this fear
I mean clearly that fear wasn't unmerited although to be fair I mean sam harris had
His own system already set up and he's just gonna make more money because patreon won't take a
I mean it's really what patreon does that revolutionary it's
Absolutely just a crowdfunding website it could not be that hard to set up
In terms of like certain things that are allowed certain things that are not allowed
But the point is there's this section of the content policy that
That specifically mandates like the things that you can do and can't do on?
patreon the platform itself
not like on Twitter but on patreon the platform itself
according to the CEO
they
Monitor what's on the patreon website and not what you what you saying on Twitter at least that's what I understand from this?
but now with the sargon incident it seems like they
From the email that he got back showing that patreon monitors not just what's on their platform but the entire online
Presence as well which is kind of crazy to me it seems like the Internet is in a really rocky time right now where you
Know all these websites that are gone so big because everyone uses them and it becomes so
Fundamental for people to have a proper
freedom of speech now these websites are
trying to decide well what is right to say on our websites and on and most of the times that isn't aligned with what the
Actual users think I don't think you can fault you YouTube for wanting to remove videos on their website
And needing to delete content. I don't think I don't think anyone
Actually has a problem with that I think the way they go about with doing it that's the problem you know because these are people's
Livelihood at stake here and I think it's especially disappointing with patreon because
they've always seem to be the face of
Alternative funding I can understand advertisers not wanting certain content but that's not
What patreon is supposed to be so what are the rules no one knows the rules everybody you see all these alternative
websites coming up alternative freedom of speech browsers
freedom of speech version of Twitter freedom of speech version of YouTube free of the speech version of patreon but they never seem to call
It on it's like these companies are already so big that it doesn't really matter
Which makes it it almost even more scary I don't know what do you think leave a comment down below
Now the most important news of all time today I've saved it for last guys
Backpack kid is suing epic games over dance in Fortnite I'm
Doing it right now backpack kid what are you gonna do you cannot stop me? I don't care
You know what's a great way to support the Pewdiepie channel that isn't through patreon and all that other bullshit
Down in description you know what to do girl that's right only girls buy my merch for some reason.
Gloria Borger out